In an article titled “Diaspora Leaders Want Their Voices Heard in Yerevan,” Liana Aghajanian, reporting for eurasianet.org, reached out to leaders of Diaspora organizations about the recent proposal to establish an upper house of the Armenian legislature, which will include representatives of the Diaspora.
During a January 30 meeting with Armenian community member in Los Angeles, Armenia’s Diaspora Minister unveiled plans for a possible parliamentary representation for Diaspora Armenians. Subsequently, members of President Serzh Sarkisian’s administration confirmed the plans, which require an amendment to the Armenia’s Constitution.
Below is Aghajanian’s article as published in eurasianet.org.
Diaspora Leaders Want Their Voices Heard in Yerevan
BY LIANA AGHAJANIAN
Armenian diaspora leaders in the United States are responding with cautious optimism to an initiative by Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian’s administration to create a second chamber of parliament, one that would give Armenians abroad more say in the shaping of public policy.
The idea of parliamentary representation for diaspora members was first floated January 30 in Los Angeles by Diaspora Affairs Minister Hranush Hakopyan. President Sarkisian the next day tacitly endorsed the concept by refusing to distance himself from Hakopyan’s comments. Since then, the topic has been hotly debated in Yerevan and in diaspora communities. Diaspora members would apparently be able to serve in the newly created Senate. Specifics of the plan remain to be worked out.
Viken Hovsepian, a member of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) Bureau, an 11-member group that is the party’s highest executive body, said he welcomed the idea. In theory, at least, the proposal could turn into a means of helping Armenia maximize its advantages as it continues to develop economically. Hovsepian resides in Los Angeles, while the ARF’s Bureau’s headquarters is in Yerevan.
“Armenia doesn’t have much in natural resources, it has a modest economy at best, but it does have a powerful diaspora, which is a huge advantage for the future,” said Hovsepian “So if authorities in Armenia have approached this not from an ideological point of view, but a very rational point of view, then there’s no other way to envision a way of involving what constitutes two-thirds of the Armenian people.”
A second chamber could play a constructive role in coordinating policy initiatives among diaspora communities and Armenians of Armenia, Hovsepian added. At the same, if not handled properly, the idea could have damaging consequences, he added. “If this is just a proposal that’s going to stay on paper, or is going to be a very compromised or a very superficial one, then it would help to increase skepticism that’s already out there,” he said. “If this is just something that [members of Sarkisian’s administration are] hoping to bring about so that they can superficially involve some diasporans, then it’s not going to go very far and it’s going to create a lot of disappointment.”
Like Hovsepian, Bryan Ardouny, the executive director of the Armenian Assembly of America, is adopting a wait-and-see stance. “The Armenian Assembly welcomes the Republic of Armenia’s outreach to the diaspora and also celebrates the unique role of the diaspora throughout the United States and other major centers in the world,” Ardouny told EurasiaNet.org via email. “The Armenian Assembly is closely following the deliberations within Parliament on this latest proposal, which recognizes the intrinsic value of outreach to the diaspora.”
Regardless of whether the diaspora-representation trial balloon takes lasting flight, Armenians abroad, especially those in the United States, appear intent on exerting influence over policymaking in Yerevan. Such a desire was on display January 30, during a protest in Los Angeles to raise awareness about domestic violence in Armenia.
Several hundred diaspora Armenians participated in the protest, some carrying placards with the image of Zaruhi Petrosyan, a 20-year-old mother who was beaten to death by her husband in late 2010. Petrosyan’s case has become a cause célèbre for civil rights activists in Armenia.
The demonstration was organized United Human Rights Council (UHRC), a group operating under the auspices of the ARF’s youth wing, and a non-governmental organization umbrella group, The Coalition to Stop Violence against Women in Armenia. Their aim was to exert pressure on the Armenian government to enact domestic violence legislation.
Protest organizers, such as Nora Kayserian, a member of the ARF’s youth wing, say they will keep agitating for change with or without immediate results from the government. “Just because we might not live in the homeland doesn’t mean we can’t fight the same fight,” Kayserian said. “There’s power in numbers, so the more people we can get, the better.”
UHRC member Vache Thomassian said the organization has mulled with the idea of a webfax program, in which members of the diaspora would be able to send messages directly to Armenian MPs. He insists, like others, that if diaspora voices aren’t heard in Armenia, they will only grow louder. “The placement of Armenians in a diaspora is an artificial construct and that doesn’t negate my ability or my desire to care about Armenia’s well-being,” he said.
A 2009 Amnesty International report on Armenia found that over a quarter of women were said to have been beaten by a family member and about two-thirds had experienced psychological abuse. Among the marchers in Los Angeles was Narine Jallatyan, a recent immigrant from Gyumri, who said that domestic violence in Armenia had almost become a norm, with women not only staying silent about abuse, but giving in to a lifetime of suffering. “I think in order for real change to take place, women have to show that they are not asleep,” she said. “If the government sees collective action, they will do something.”
Domestic violence appears to be an especially sensitive topic for Armenian-Americans. According to community advocates, abuse is “alive and well” within the diaspora community in and around Los Angeles, home to the second largest population of Armenians outside of Armenia. Manya Lefian and Lena Bozoyan, anti-domestic violence advocates in the heavily Armenian populated city of Glendale, California, said victims began reaching out to them directly a few years ago. The biggest cultural hurdle Armenians face is that families are accustomed to resolving matters on their own, taking care not to not air out problems in public, said Bozoyan. With the help of several community organizations however, the activists have made some headway, including introducing domestic violence education into Glendale schools and receiving a grant to assist victims with shelter and counseling services.
Armenian Women, let us set a forum – with political, economical, social and educational branches.
The change in the women condition in Armenia will come, if very wide spectrum of women in Armenia will be given a help for an affordable, college-level education in modern business, trade, economics, finance, and general technological skills. Our motto should be – Freedom and Confidence are Sisters of Education.
Many of us, with higher education experience, can take good care of such projects. For instance, recently, I came up with an idea of creation of a community college for young women in Syunik. My ancestors are from Syunik and I know well the bright, skilful, energetic women of the land. They need some initial educational boost-training about contemporary enterprising. They need a general upbringing. Each of these women will become a seed for a future enterprise. The region will flourish, and so will the entire country. Women of Armenia can take care of their dignity without external help. But we can help them to stand on their own feet, as it is happening now in major cities.
Besides doing rallies and holding banners, can we unite and do highly honorable thing – delivering freedom and confidence through education?!