YEREVAN—Heritage Party founder and former foreign minister Raffi Hovannisian on Friday urged Baku to recognize Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) during a speech he delivered in Baku at an International Conference of Asian Political Parties.
The 7th General Assembly of the International Conference of Asian Political Parties (ICAPP) brought together 250 delegates representing 60 political parties from 25 Asian nations, together with a host of Azerbaijani functionaries.
The Heritage Party press service provided the text of Hovannisian’s speech, which is presented below.
Mister chairman, distinguished colleagues:
I shall speak but once, so let it be crystal clear.
In a critical but good-faith search for peace, security, and reconciliation in Asia, I came to this beautiful city of Baku, where hundreds of thousands of Armenians once lived before they were forcibly dispossessed and expelled in January 1990 and whose erstwhile presence has been reduced to one remnant church which has been shut down and transformed to foreign purpose. Virtually none remains today, and although our Azerbaijani colleagues make reference to the existence of several thousand ethnic Armenians, I have seen no evidence of that claim. I have asked the authorities here to arrange for me a meeting with even one Armenian who dares to identify himself as such in current-day Baku.
I came here with a different, dialogue-driven spirit and intent, but have immediately faced a stark but expected reality of partisanship, selective propaganda, repetitive rhetoric, unparalleled l xenophobia, and an untruthful presentation of parochial positions—not only in society and political circles but also at the presidential level.
Everything that stands against the precepts and principles of ICAPP.
There can be no peace, security and reconciliation in our region as long as:
1. Azerbaijan launches a failed war of aggression against Mountainous Karabagh and its freedom-loving people, as well as against its own minorities living in its midst, and then blames the self-defenders for that failure;
2. Azerbaijan pursues an official policy of intentional destruction of cultural heritage, and most particularly the daylit destruction in December 2005 of thousands of hand-crafted khatchkars (cross-stones) at the medieval Armenian cemetery at Jugha, Nakhichevan—not as collateral damage of war, but 11 years after the ceasefire and hundreds of miles away from the conflict zone—and ever since has blocked all international missions to the site of this shameful desecration;
3. Azerbaijan continues to release and glorify convicted axe-murderers for the sole reason that the victim is Armenian, without even one voice of condemnation of this cowardly act of hatred in what the founder of ICAPP has referred to as “this inclusive democracy”; and
4. Azerbaijan, in a redundant war of words and terminologies, throws about at meetings such as this the loaded language of “occupation,” when in reality it was liberation, decolonization and everybody’s right to self-determination, and when “occupation” in fact applies most appropriately to Azerbaijani and Turkish control—through genocide, ethnic cleansing, and then the shame of official denialism—of large swathes of the Armenian patrimony from Shahumian and Nakhichevan to the western reaches of the Armenian Plateau.
Peace, security, and reconciliation are possible, however, when we all live by the same standards:
1. achievement of good, self-critical governance, public accountability, and the assumption of responsibility for safeguarding the equal civil rights and human dignity of our own constituents, opposition parties, non-governmental organizations, and minorities;
2. empowerment of the average citizen, civil society, and true democracy, not rule by dynasty or dictatorship;
3. recognition of the liberty, sovereignty, and integrity of all states, old and new, including the Republic of Mountainous Karabagh, whose return to the status quo ante is impossible, but rather whose recognition within its constitutional frontiers will enable a simultaneous, multilateral, and reciprocal right of return for all refugees of all nationalities—not only the displaced Azerbaijanis, but also the more than half million Armenian deportees from Shahumian, Nakhichevan, Artsvashen, and Azerbaijan proper, together with the descendants of the victims and survivors of the great genocide and national dispossession of the Armenian people;
4. protection of all cultural heritage and condemnation of all desecration of that heritage, whether Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish, Christian, or other;
5. prevention and punishment of all genocides and crimes against humanity; and
6. the exercise of humanity and upholding of the common understanding that pain and suffering are universal and, in this connection, due remembrance of the thousands of righteous Turkish neighbors who demonstrated these virtues in saving Armenian lives, including my grandmother’s, during the Genocide of 1915, as well as the hundreds of Azerbaijanis of good conscience who attempted to do the same during the anti-Armenian pogroms in Sumgait and Baku decades later.
For this I am grateful. And hopeful for a better day for the sake of our generations to come.
I thank you for your kind invitation, hospitality, and attention to the whole truth, however terrible or uncomfortable it might be.
Why Raffi Hovannisian is not the President of Armenia?
Because 99.99% of Armenian politicians are corrupt and they function like a regular Mafia.
Because Armenian Citizen voters are oppressed by dictatorial regime and brainwashed and bribed and threatened to vote from freedom of choice.
Great speech. Raffi Hovannisian is my hope for Armenia.
Good speech. Will do no good as long as there are petrodollars, but good speech.
Raffi Hovanissian is a natural statesman of international standard. The eloquence of his speech is emotionally overwhelming. I had previously read his name, but it never registered anything with me before. This speech has placed him on my conscious plot map. I will be following his career from now on. He should bserve Armenia at the UN.
Better to live in Saudi Arabia than Azerbaijan…
There is more human right in Arab Countries than such a rich state like Azeris…
Where no Armenians exist…after living there for centuries,,,
Any one heard of Azerbaijan before…?
Ya Saudi Arabia is really bad example, they have Sharia Law, it the worse.
Great job RAFFI
Thank you
Step by step we will have great leaders
I Liked The Speech ,
Karabakh is part of the Motherland Armenia. I fully support Hovannisian in his fight.
TO Ari: Because he is too good at the moment and if he becomes a president he might become more corrupt. He is better off like this than corrupted.
Raffi i know you long time and i know long time you had a tiger heart and it was missing
now i know old tiger weak up bravo
When a person have a ball to call Artsakh independence in enemy land, that person shall be rewarded as a war hero, same level as Monte!! This is why Sultan’s #1 enemy are Armenians from diaspora!!
Great job by Raffi!!We need more politicians like him in Armenia!! I wish him a good luck during presidential election!!
Speech. If this is truly an Armenian site, then you should know that spelling must be Hovhannesian.
Anyway, for all kind of people.
I am not sure about the depth and durability and the clarity of this very important condition #3:
“… not only the displaced Azerbaijanis, but also the more than half million Armenian deportees from Shahumian, Nakhichevan, Artsvashen, and Azerbaijan proper, together with the descendants of the victims and survivors of the great genocide and national dispossession of the Armenian people; …”
While Azeris will be happy to live in Armenia and on the Armenian territories, Armenians today are living Armenia. So, in worst case scenario (of non-zero probability), Azeris will make majority on territories under discussion, as it happened in Nakhichevan. This is really tricky issue.
I should say to any “patriotically” inclined person, don’t talk about things that are not 100% for Armenians, even if these things make you politically popular and attractive for “democratic” sponsors trying to find a “right” person to be their marionette. I don’t like saying this on the occasion of Hovhannisian’s speech, though.
Really?
It really happened?